Units of the Unmanned Systems Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine hit an average of 756 targets daily in July, including 166 enemy personnel.
This is stated in the monthly report published by the commander of the Unmanned Systems Forces, Robert "Madyar" Brovdi, on his Telegram channel, the Ukrainian News agency reports.
"From interesting figures that deserve attention. 756 targets on average per day. 166 worms daily. 2% - the number of the Unmanned Systems Forces Group relative to the total number of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 31.8% - the specific weight of all verified worm detoxes (every third). 36.3% - the specific weight of all verified enemy targets. All units of the Unmanned Systems Forces Group have been working for a month in a single system of electronic accounting of used means and warheads, results, planning and analysis," wrote Madyar.
At the same time, he noted that the ratio of irretrievable losses of the Group's personnel relative to enemy losses is 1:604, and the ratio of financial costs is 1:100 dollars.
According to Madyar, 29,172 FPV drones, 1,051 Mavics, 530 night bombers and 655 fighter jets were used to destroy or defeat 23,433 targets (including 5,134 occupiers) in July.
In total, more than 75,000 rounds of ammunition were used.
The commander reported that the average efficiency of the use of FPV drones was 39.6% (11,538 effective hits compared to the 29,172 drones used), and the average hit rate of night bombers was 60.3% (19,605 effective hits).
Madyar also mentioned the involvement of the Unmanned Systems Forces in the destruction of the fuel base of the Sochi airport (russia).
"Well, Sochi, of course, Sochi. We're not there. 14th Unmanned Systems Forces Regiment," the commander wrote.
As the Ukrainian News agency earlier reported, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Oleksandr Syrskyi, reported that in June every third enemy target hit by the Ukrainian Defense Forces was on the account of the Unmanned Systems Forces.
Who we are: About us, Contacts. How we write news and our principles: Editorial code. We did our best. If you found this valuable – please support us.
To request a correction, please send an email.